Blog arrow Forum  
Monday, 13 October 2008
Main Menu
Blog
Home
Forum
Links
Search
FAQs
Shiny Objects
Politics Blog Top Sites

Add to Google

Add to My Yahoo!

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to My MSN

Stumble Upon Toolbar

Site Meter
Honored Friends
Honored Blogs
CB Login
CB Workflows
FireBoard
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Parties sue for N.C. ballot access (1 viewing) (1) Guests
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Parties sue for N.C. ballot access
#257
greenascanbe (Admin)
now you see it, now you
Admin
Posts: 312
graph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
kai Kai Schwandes schwandes@hotmail.com Location: currently planet earth Birthdate: 1962-01-18
Parties sue for N.C. ballot access 5 Months, 1 Week ago Karma: 2  
05/05/2008 07:54 PM
By: Deborah Tuff

NORTH CAROLINA -- The Libertarian and Green parties of North Carolina are
suing the state for ballot access.

The parties have been battling the state Board of Elections for what they
say is their constitutional right – to have a candidate consistently on the
ballot. Under North Carolina law, a group must get 70,000 valid voter
signatures to be considered an official political party. In addition, to
make sure they have enough valid voters, they must get at least 30,000 more
signatures.

"It's absolutely frustrating, I have to go up to 108,000 people and say,
‘can I have your permission to participate in the electoral process?’ It's
somewhat demeaning,” said Barbara Howe, N.C. Libertarian Party chair.


The court did not make a decision on Monday. They hope to have one within
the next three days. The hearing continues Tuesday.

http://preview.tinyurl.com/6r5dzb

06/01/08

Judge rules against Libs, Greens

28 MAY 2008 • by Lisa Sorg

Political parties don't have a fundamental right to appear on the North Carolina ballot, according to a judge's ruling today. (Read the order: PDF, 116 KB.)

Wake County Superior Court Judge Robert Hobgood ruled against the Libertarian and Green parties, which had sued the State Board of Elections, contending the signature requirements to get on the ballot were onerous and unconstitutional.

"We're deeply saddened by this ruling," said Barbara Howe, Libertarian Party of North Carolina chair, in a prepared statement. "Not only did the judge support the State's power to take away our right to choose who represents us, he also upheld the State's assertion that North Carolina voters are not smart enough to fill out a so-called long ballot."

North Carolina has one of the most restrictive ballot access laws in the nation. Currently, third parties must collect more than 67,000 valid signatures to be listed on the ballot. That is the equivalent to 2 percent of the number of voters in the last gubernatorial election. The Libertarian Party successfully collected about 79,000 valid signatures to be on the fall ballot, but the effort took four years and cost nearly $140,000.

The Green Party has never appeared on the North Carolina ballot.

In testimony at trial earlier this month, Howe, who has run for several offices, including governor, as a Libertarian, argued that number could increase to at least 80,000 signatures due to an increased voter turnout in this election, and the state's population growth.

In the Hobgood's order, he wrote the state has a "compelling interest" in requiring a "preliminary modicum of support before recognizing a political party and placing its candidates on the ballot."

The state contended that relaxing the ballot access laws would cause voter confusion and would clutter the ballot. Ten Council of State races appear on the ballot, and those offices are elected the same years as the president and vice president of the United States.

Hobgood agreed, ruling that "the more parties there are that are recognized by the State and that place candidates on the ballot, the greater chance there is for ballots that are so long as to be unwieldy and to risk voter confusion and frustration of the electoral process."

Elena Everett, chair of the N.C. Green Party, said it is likely the groups will appeal the decision. "I think the [judge's ruling] was motivated in that they don’t want to rock the boat and let people on ballot this fall. We had really strong arguments. I'm disappointed."
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2008/06/01 10:01 By greenascanbe. Reason: outcome of suit
 
wisdom: where bullshit meets ignorance
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
      Topics Author Date
  Topic is sticky. thread link
Parties sue for N.C. ballot access
greenascanbe 2008/05/06 07:29
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
Webdesign by Webmedie.dk Webdesign by Webmedie.dk